arg9

•Death penalty, bad, cruel, live, life, allow, able to, a right, justice, killers, chance, forgive, hard, mistake, God, perfect, human, try, better person.
 * Lucero Montserrat Rosales Quezada **
 * Brainstorming: **


 * Outline: **


 * Thesis statement: ** Because of cruel people, Death Penalty has been a way to condemn cruel people, but they should not be allowed it because humans' pain will not end by killing guilty people , and because in some cases they blame people who are innocent.

•If people do not kill them they will continue killing.


 * They can be dangerous
 * They are not unaware .

•The pain will not finish.
 * The pain is difficult to get away.
 * It is not in poeple's hands.

•Inoccent people are killed. > >
 * Murders are very intelligent.
 * There has to be justice.


 * <span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13px;">Why people do not have to be agree with death penalty by Montserrat Rosales **

<span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13px;">People feel entitled to punish bad people by killing them, but they do not have the power to decide this. Death penalty has been used by 60 countries in the world even thought they do not have good reasons to do it. People are allowed to live because life has been given to us for that reason. <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Because of cruel people, Death Penalty has been a way to condemn cruel people, but they should not be allowed it because humans' pain will not end by killing guilty people<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">, and because in some cases they blame people who are innocent.

Even though there have been a lot of comments about death penalty, it could be a good option to solve murders around the world. According to Byron (2000, p.9) “And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence.” When somebody starts killing, it is difficult that he or she stops doing it. According to Byron (2000, p.9) “Some people claim to be so firmly against the death penalty that they cannot envision circumstances in which they would freely change their position”. Sometimes people have to stay in the feet of those who have lost a loved person because the only thing they crave is to do justice by killing the murders. Despite of the good arguments about the improvement of death penalty, people have to know that to kill will not solve the loss of a loved.

People who kill murders will not finish with crime, and victims’ families will not stay hands folded just by doing this. According to Abbott (2011) “The idea that the death penalty provides "closure" for victims' families is a myth.” Even thought people affected by murders apparently have been finished with the responsible person of the murder, they will never be in peace because of the trauma they will carry on for the rest for their lives. So killing that person will not solve the trauma of the relatives of the victim. According to Abbott (2011) “If you execute a contract killer, for example, it would not deter a terrorist.” So the problem of this kind of crime just can be solved by doing something not related to death because it just brings more suicides and sadness’s. Also people have to take into accoun t that some killed people are at the end innocent.

Death penalty just applies to people who have killed somebody, but in most of the cases it is not true. According to Abbott (2011) “Another myth is that only the guilty are executed”. Murders are most of the time intelligent people, so they do all the possible to make guilty somebody else to save their own lives. Also that innocent people are killed without a reasonable reason. According to Abbott (2011) “Even when police do their jobs professionally and in good faith, mistakes will be made and innocent people will be convicted.” Sometimes it is hard to find the real murderer, and they can not be killing innocent people until find the real responsible. Since my point of view the best argue to make people reflect about death penalty is that if they kill murders, it will not be end of the problem.

People usually look for along term solution that finish with the pain of a murder, also in my opinion death penalty is not one of them. I think that humans are not the indicated to do justice in those cases, the only who can do it is our supreme being. If people kill, it will make them killers. So killing people will never end with the pain that familiars' murder have. It will be useless. The best option is that God always do justice, and he will be responsible to solve a murder.

<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">References: Byron, M. (2000). //Why My Opinion Shouldn’t Count: Revenge, Retribution, and the Death Penalty Debate//. Review by Charly T. //31//(3), 307-315.

Abbott, J. (2011). //Death Penalty Information Center//. Retriered from [].